Video: Ulbergas Zaļā vārna nominēta Latvijas Literatūras gada balvai

Pavisam īsi un ātri- grāmata ir amorāla. Varone slimo ar šizofrēniju. Elemetāri būtu ļaut varonei izārstēties, tas nenotiek. Līdz ar to ir tā, ka ja pieņemu,ka varone ir tomēr vesela - tad viņa ir egoisma,bezatbildības, prostitūcijas laulībā - ļaut sevi drāzt,par to pretī saņemot iespēju nestrādāt, paraugs. Pretīgs, zemisks mūsu sabiedrības cilvēks. Tomēr visvairāk mani satrieca varones attieksme pret bērniem. Ja vēl Rukšāne visur skandina,ka darbs ir autobiogrāfisks - tad es teiktu - noziedzniece. Vienkārši noziedzniece. Bet kā jau esmu rakstījusi - draudzeņu muguras kā mūris .... un tad gaida,lai sabiedrība novērtē latviešu literatūru ....

Professor--"I don't think it would be an awful rule but the problem is that it ferocs incumbents to take trusted advisors out of government the moment they start to run for re-election or for another office. You need to balance that form of brain drain with any fairness advantage." "Brain drain"? Nonsense. An incumbent has any number of competent individuals to choose from to serve as separate advisors regarding governmental affairs AND for a re-election campaign.George Mitchell--Your attempt at linking Obama's tactics with those allegedly committed by Wink and company is NOT comparing apples to apples. Try again!Professor--"My consistent view has been that an absolute prohibition on politics in a government office by political appointees is unworkable..."I don't think any of the commentators have been calling for an "absolute prohibition"; rather, they want to maintain the current distinctions as to what is and is not allowable regarding how one conducts campaign business on the taxpayer dime. Indeed, the lines may be blurred, but there are CLEAR instances in which politicking and campaigning do not MIX.The public has no problem, I don't think, with politicians using government computers off site to conduct government business...not campaign business! It is about efficiency. What the public does object to is when an incumbent cloaks campaign activities under the guise of government business.Professor--"So someone in Mayor Barrett's office who must take a call or send an e-mail on political business and who does it on a nongovernmental cell phone or lap top is not doing anything wrong."No one is saying otherwise, I don't think. The objection is to WHAT is the content and context of that political business--is it about policy or about campaigning? And, if it is about campaigning, is the conversation mundane or profane? That is why records are kept and, if there are shenanigans, they can be examined and scrutinized.Professor--It would be troublesome, on a number of grounds, to treat elected officials in a way that made it difficult for them to run for re-election or another office.Actually, the current laws in place, I do believe, have made elected officials keenly aware of what they can and cannot do. Some, unfortunately, try to skirt the law.

Taatad jeedzienu eetika var attiecinaat uz zhurnaalistiem, policistiem, deputaatiem, tikai ne uz rakstnieceem

Un kā ir ar sirdsapziņu, Kristīn?