Tramps vairs necildina Putinu

Interesanti tie meinstrīma atbalstītāji, kā partijas līnija nosaka, tā raksta (gan žurnālisti, gan komentētāji). Diemžēl, raksturīgi ne tikai LV, bet daudz plašāk, kaut tajā pašā USA pat meinstrīma masu mediji cenšas izrādīt objektivitāti šad tad.

"Hillary Clinton also possesses Moscow links that merit investigation. I’ve previously explained how Kremlin money found its way to the Podesta Group, the prominent Democratic lobbying firm that just happens to be headed by the brother of her campaign chairman, John Podesta (who co-founded the firm). However, recent revelations indicate that Hillary’s dubious Kremlin ties go far deeper. A new report by Peter Schweizer, who’s spent years investigating the dubious and convoluted finances of Clinton, Inc., raises troubling questions about just how deep Hillary’s Moscow’s ties are—and whom exactly they’re with. Hillary encouraged and enabled American and European investment in Russia, particularly in high-tech firms. A key role was played by the Skolkovo Innovation Center, a sprawling complex in Moscow’s western suburbs that was established in 2009 as Russia’s answer to Silicon Valley. With encouragement from the State Department, American companies jumped aboard. Cisco pledged $1 billion of investment in Skolkovo in 2010, and Google and Intel quickly joined the bandwagon. All three “just happened” to be major investors in the Clinton Foundation too. it’s no surprise that Western intelligence considers Skolkovo to be an extension of Russia’s military-industrial complex—and its intelligence services. A July 2013 unclassified study by U.S. European Command that surveyed Skolkovo activities suggested, in delicate language, that Russia’s Silicon Valley is “an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage.” " http://observer.com/2016/08/hillarys-secret-kremlin-connection-is-quickly-unraveling/

Nevis vins necildina Putinu, bet parmet Obamam un Klintonei, ka vini nevar tikt ar Krieviju galaa un ka Putlers deel viņiem neciena ASV. Vai kads redaktors pats skataas/ lasa ko saka tramps, vai tikai parraksta savaa interpretacijaa?