Afganistānas nemilitāro kravu pārvadājumu koridoru varētu pārveidot par komerciālu

don't bypass *any* enptrcyion/obfuscation in the future , it would have made sense. It's ethically totally unacceptable to act this way for one product only. The fact is, we don't even release an obfuscator ourselves, because we think it's unethical to offer both a decompiler and an obfuscator.We'll bypass obfuscations, as much as technically possible to the best of our ability, as long as our customers request so. However, we also have a policy not to bypass an obfuscation too soon, we wait 3 to 6 months.Again, don't forget, there are many decompilers out there. Suppose we stopped bypassing obfuscations, another decompiler vendor will quickly fill in.> a member of one of the largest piracy groups in the worldAnd you claim, ASV is used for theft. Why do you bother then?> Oh and just in case you think I’m some kiddie.Now that you say this, I think you may be one Or you may be +RaYmoNd I don't care. I know that you are wrong and I'm right. Lets assume you are the greatest pirate in the world and you release ASV as warez, and assume, as you think, it ruins my business. And, you do it for all decompilers, so they all disappear. Do you think that will be a stable state? Someone will write a new decompiler from scratch in no time, and you'll be at square one. And what can you do for an Open Source and free decompiler?There's legit need for decompilers (even if you don't see it). As long as the need is there, there will be decompilers around. And there will be obfuscators around. That's FOL (fact of life), get over with it.Burak

The question is not will the inenrtet be able to handle it but will the human brain be able to cope with the fast developments all around it and should we call a time-out.